11 Ways To Totally Defy Your Asbestos Lawsuit History

Lauderhill asbestos attorney  have led to the bankruptcies of a number of businesses. A knowledgeable mesothelioma lawyer will help you secure compensation.

Experts in the field of health have warned for years about the dangers asbestos exposure. Industry leaders have downplayed these risks. Over time, asbestos-related diseases became more common.

The Third Case

Asbestos-related lawsuits started to gain momentum in 1970s, after studies by scientists began to link asbestos with serious illnesses like asbestosis or mesothelioma. Thousands of lawsuits were filed as asbestos-related diseases rarely manifest for years after exposure. These lawsuits were filed in Texas because of its favorable laws.

Johns Manville was the leading producer in the 1940s and 1950s of asbestos products. This case had a significant impact on asbestos litigation. In the 1980s it was revealed that Lewis Brown, the CEO of the company, put profits over the health and safety of his employees. Deposition testimony revealed that he was heavily influenced by the company's chief medical advisor Dr. Russell Budd. Budd was a doctor who was well-known for his sloppy disregard for the health of workers.

Johns Manville was found to have been aware of the dangers associated with asbestos however, they did not take any steps to safeguard their workers. The court found that the company is responsible for any damages that occur if employees later develop mesothelioma or any other asbestos-related illness. The court also decided that the company was liable for the family members of deceased workers.

After the decision in Borel many asbestos victims and families sought compensation from the companies that made use of asbestos as a material. Unfortunately, the majority of these claims were rejected for various reasons. Some cases were allowed to continue and the courts drafted a set of guidelines for the handling of asbestos-related lawsuits.

In the 1990s, asbestos defendants continued to seek legal rulings to limit their liability. They wanted to be able argue that asbestos materials were not a part of their product and therefore they should not be held responsible for injuries incurred by those who employed with asbestos. These claims were unsuccessful, and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to recognize the "asbestos product" defense.

Federal and state laws protect the right of a mesothelioma patient to seek compensation for their condition from the parties accountable in a specific case. Insurance companies continue to fight against these claims.